My primary role was to help make sure Web2.0 communities knew about ARIA, and to help them with any implementation work through what amounted to a mutual-mentorship. I'll discuss deliverables related to this evangelism-ish goal first, and then move on to some more specific community work. Then come back at the end with some brief thoughts on the evangelism aspect.
Initially and iteratively I worked with Aaron Leventhal on strategic ways to spread awareness of ARIA. At some point we realized developers needed a place to go for sample code, and hey, code talks, baby.
codetalks.org
We started to see additional people and communities providing great resources about ARIA. As specification and best practices work continued in the W3C, we realized it would be nice to provide a central hub for all the ARIA activity and evangelism that was happening "in the wild". Together this community created a 'vendor neutral' wiki: wiki.codetalks.org, as well as an svn code repository, and bug database. These sites are hosted by the ATRC, and we plan to continue hosting them as long as they are useful. Aaron created a free-aria google group for, not surprisingly, the free discussion of ARIA. Oh, by the way, any readers good with logo design?
W3C PFWG ARIA team
Given my prior work on Dojo Toolkit Accessibility, and my colleague Joseph Scheuhammer's work on the Fluid Project, we were invited to join the ARIA specification efforts as 'invited experts'. Our input to the discussions came primarily from actually trying things out, and our work on Dojo and jQuery.
DHTML Style Guide
The ATRC continues to attend and contribute to the DHTML Style Guide meetings which address keyboard bindings for DHTML widgets.
jQuery UI
A core contributor is leading the ARIA effort here, and I feel it is in good hands, with a decent community effort; so in a sense, "job done!" The community has not finished of course, but we've got a pretty clear roadmap ahead, and we've made some good progress. As a major redesign (in UI) moves forward so does the opportunity for further ARIA support. We've added the core ARIA support and it takes about a day or two to add ARIA support, with automated tests, to a jQuery UI 'plugin' (think 'widget' or 'component'). Adding polished keyboard interaction can take longer. The ATRC's Fluid Project team, having already worked through a lot of keyboard and navigation issues on top of jQuery, is now moving this know-how upstream and working with the jQuery UI community.
Dojo (Dijit)
We continued to work with the Dojo community on dijit, the mature and accessible widget set, with a focus toward helping sustainability. Joseph was our main resource for this work and initially focussed on grid widget keyboard accessibility (non-trivial) and spent a fair amount of time doing QA, including manual tests. Later he created automated UI tests using a robot currently found in Dojo's test harness: D.O.H. and has worked to move ARIA smarts into Dojo core.
codetalks.orgWe started to see additional people and communities providing great resources about ARIA. As specification and best practices work continued in the W3C, we realized it would be nice to provide a central hub for all the ARIA activity and evangelism that was happening "in the wild". Together this community created a 'vendor neutral' wiki: wiki.codetalks.org, as well as an svn code repository, and bug database. These sites are hosted by the ATRC, and we plan to continue hosting them as long as they are useful. Aaron created a free-aria google group for, not surprisingly, the free discussion of ARIA. Oh, by the way, any readers good with logo design?
W3C PFWG ARIA team
Given my prior work on Dojo Toolkit Accessibility, and my colleague Joseph Scheuhammer's work on the Fluid Project, we were invited to join the ARIA specification efforts as 'invited experts'. Our input to the discussions came primarily from actually trying things out, and our work on Dojo and jQuery.
DHTML Style Guide
The ATRC continues to attend and contribute to the DHTML Style Guide meetings which address keyboard bindings for DHTML widgets.
jQuery UI
A core contributor is leading the ARIA effort here, and I feel it is in good hands, with a decent community effort; so in a sense, "job done!" The community has not finished of course, but we've got a pretty clear roadmap ahead, and we've made some good progress. As a major redesign (in UI) moves forward so does the opportunity for further ARIA support. We've added the core ARIA support and it takes about a day or two to add ARIA support, with automated tests, to a jQuery UI 'plugin' (think 'widget' or 'component'). Adding polished keyboard interaction can take longer. The ATRC's Fluid Project team, having already worked through a lot of keyboard and navigation issues on top of jQuery, is now moving this know-how upstream and working with the jQuery UI community.
Dojo (Dijit)
We continued to work with the Dojo community on dijit, the mature and accessible widget set, with a focus toward helping sustainability. Joseph was our main resource for this work and initially focussed on grid widget keyboard accessibility (non-trivial) and spent a fair amount of time doing QA, including manual tests. Later he created automated UI tests using a robot currently found in Dojo's test harness: D.O.H. and has worked to move ARIA smarts into Dojo core.
ARIA Evangelism
One thing I've struggled with in the evangelism part of our grant is knowing when we are successful, or even when we are finished. Other browsers and toolkits are adding ARIA support, but how much did the ATRC help make that happen? Did we use the right amount of pressure? Did we help enough? I think we'll never know.
One thing I do know is that the Mozilla Foundation likes to seed activities that fit its wonderful manifesto/mission. I can say that in this respect the Foundation has been very successful here, and that the ATRC continues to pursue and win funding that will allow us to continue to focus efforts on open web accessibility now and into the future.
One thing I've struggled with in the evangelism part of our grant is knowing when we are successful, or even when we are finished. Other browsers and toolkits are adding ARIA support, but how much did the ATRC help make that happen? Did we use the right amount of pressure? Did we help enough? I think we'll never know.
One thing I do know is that the Mozilla Foundation likes to seed activities that fit its wonderful manifesto/mission. I can say that in this respect the Foundation has been very successful here, and that the ATRC continues to pursue and win funding that will allow us to continue to focus efforts on open web accessibility now and into the future.
Finally, all this experience is helping me in my current gecko work!
